paper
The Golem and the Game of Automation
A historical interpretation connects Wiener’s warnings with interactive learning.
Avery Slater reads Norbert Wiener’s Golem imagery alongside reinforcement learning and cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. The paper treats the relation between creator and machine as a learning game.[1]
Contribution and relevance
Its close reading connects mis-specified rewards, incomplete knowledge, and the difficulty of intervening when machine actions outpace human supervision. The comparison helps place Reward Hacking and AI Alignment within a longer history of automation concerns.[1]
Evidence limits
This is a historical and conceptual argument, not a new algorithm or safety experiment. Similarities between Wiener and later research do not establish direct intellectual influence on particular researchers. Cooperative learning is discussed under modeled shared objectives; the discussion does not guarantee alignment for every deployment or resolve conflicts among people. Read the cited original technical papers before making performance claims.
Sources
- The Golem and the Game of Automation · Source record src-046 · Back to claim ↑1 ↑2
Pages that link here
- Avery Slater person
Last updated 2026-10-07